Why Did Trump Win the 2024 Elections? A Comprehensive Analysis
.jpeg "President Trump standing in the podium") |
| Donald Trump |
Donald Trump won at the 2024 US presidential election because he spoke the language of the ordinary man. Trump’s return to the White House sparked intense discussions about the factors that led to his victory. One reason he won was his focus on key issues that resonated with conservative Americans and tapped into the concerns and fears of the American people, issues such as border control, immigration, the economy, tariffs, and abortion policies.
Trump's Victory in the 2024 Elections
Overview of the Election Results
Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 presidential election came as a surprise to many political analysts and pollsters. The race was tight, with Trump securing a narrow win in several key swing states, ultimately leading to his Electoral College victory.
Historically, these states have fluctuated between Democratic and Republican support, making them essential for determining the overall outcome. Winning them is crucial for securing the electoral votes needed to claim victory.
Seven key swing states were instrumental in Donald Trump winning the 2024 elections. The states were Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
Swing states have a big impact on the Electoral College because they are highly competitive, meaning their electoral votes could go to either major candidate. The Electoral College is a unique system used in the United States to determine the outcome of presidential elections. It allocates electoral votes to each state based on its population, with a majority of 270 votes required to win the presidency.
Most states utilise a "winner-takes-all" approach, meaning the candidate who wins the most votes in that state receives all of its electoral votes, no matter the margin of victory. This makes swing states crucial, as they can swing the outcome by shifting large blocks of votes toward one candidate or another, often determining the final outcome of the election.
The difference between the popular vote and the electoral vote lies in “who” each one represents and “how” it affects the election outcome:
Popular Vote: This is the total number of individual votes cast by the public across the country. It demonstrates which candidate has the most widespread backing among voters.
Electoral Vote: This vote comes from the Electoral College, where each state has a certain number of electoral votes based on its population. Winning a state's popular vote generally gives the candidate all its electoral votes. States with larger populations typically offer a higher number of electoral votes.
To secure the presidency, a candidate must obtain a majority of the electoral votes, which requires at least 270 out of a total of 538. This system means a candidate can win the popular vote nationally but lose in the Electoral College, which determines the official outcome.
Several factors played crucial roles in Trump's successful bid for the presidency. Among these, border control, immigration, economic concerns, and social issues like abortion stood out as particularly influential.
Border Control and Illegal Immigration
Throughout his campaign, Trump maintained a hardline stance on border security and illegal immigration. He promised to complete the border wall, implement stricter enforcement measures, and reduce the flow of undocumented immigrants into the country.
The U.S. has witnessed a historic influx of immigrants, with 47.8 million calling the nation home in 2023. This represents a significant increase from the previous year and underscores the country's enduring appeal as a destination for those seeking opportunity and refuge. This diverse group includes naturalised citizens, lawful permanent and temporary residents, as well as unauthorised immigrants. Although immigrants currently comprise 14.3% of the U.S. population, this figure, although substantial, remains below the all-time high of 14.8% recorded in 1890.
Mexico dominated the list of source countries, providing 10.9 million immigrants, a significant 23% of the total. India, China, and the Philippines trailed behind with 2.9 million, 2.4 million, and 2.1 million immigrants, respectively. While a significant portion of these immigrants have legal status as naturalised citizens, lawful permanent residents, or temporary residents, approximately 23% remain unauthorised. This indicates that over 2.5 million immigrants are currently residing in the United States without proper documentation.
Many Americans, particularly in border states and rural areas, expressed concerns about the impact of illegal immigration on jobs, public services, and national security. Trump's tough rhetoric on this issue resonated strongly with these voters.
The problem of border control in the United States is a complex issue with varying perspectives. While some argue for stricter measures, others emphasise the importance of balancing security with humanitarian concerns.
One of the most significant challenges lies along the U.S.-Mexico border. This vast, often remote border is vulnerable to illegal crossings by individuals seeking asylum, economic opportunities, or criminal activities. The influx of migrants, including unaccompanied minors and families, has put a strain on border patrol resources and sparked debates about immigration policy.
Other borders, such as the U.S.-Canada border, while less frequently discussed, also require careful monitoring. While the two countries share a strong relationship, there are concerns about illegal drug trafficking, human smuggling, and other illicit activities.
The perceived failure of the previous administration to address border security effectively became a rallying point for Trump supporters. This sentiment was particularly strong in key swing states with significant rural and working-class populations.
While the influx of immigrants may initially exert downward pressure on wages due to increased labour supply, the long-term economic impact is generally positive. As immigrants spend their earnings, they stimulate domestic demand, leading to job creation in various sectors. Additionally, businesses often respond to increased labour supply by investing in capital, which can boost productivity and wages over time. But many Americans did not see it that way when they voted Trump into the White House.
The severity of the border control problem is subject to interpretation. Some argue that the situation is a crisis, while others view it as a manageable challenge. However, it is clear that the issue requires careful consideration and effective solutions that address both security and humanitarian concerns.
Economic Factors
The economy played a pivotal role in the 2024 election. Despite some improvements, many Americans still felt economic uncertainty and anxiety about their financial futures.
The United States experienced significant economic growth in 2022 and 2023. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) expanded by 1.9% in 2022, followed by a 2.5% increase in 2023. This growth propelled the U.S. economy to a total GDP of $27.4 trillion in 2023.
The primary drivers of this economic expansion were increased consumer spending, investments in businesses, government spending, and a surge in exports.
While the U.S. economy has experienced growth, several factors contribute to ongoing economic stress and uncertainty:
Inflation: Rising inflation rates have eroded purchasing power, making it harder for Americans to afford everyday goods and services.
Interest Rate Hikes: The Federal Reserve has raised interest rates to combat inflation, increasing borrowing costs for businesses and consumers.
Global Economic Uncertainty: Global economic factors, such as geopolitical tensions and supply chain disruptions, can impact the U.S. economy.
Income Inequality: The gap between the rich and poor continues to widen, leading to social and economic disparities.
Job Market Worries: While the unemployment rate is low, many Americans are concerned about job security and wage stagnation.
Housing Market Challenges: Rising housing costs and mortgage rates have made it difficult for many Americans to afford homes.
Despite overall economic growth, these factors contribute to a sense of economic anxiety and uncertainty among many Americans.
National Debt Concerns
The ballooning national debt became a major talking point during the campaign. As of November 2024, the United States federal government owes over $35 trillion, and the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio is approximately 123%. This means that the U.S. government debt is 123% of the country's Gross Domestic Product.
Trump capitalised on this issue, promising to reduce government spending and implement policies to address the debt crisis.
The U.S. national debt is a major concern due to its potential negative impact on economic growth, fiscal sustainability, and future generations:
Rising Debt Levels: The national debt has been steadily increasing over the years, reaching historic highs. This is primarily due to government spending exceeding tax revenue, particularly during economic downturns and periods of increased government spending.
Interest Payments: As the debt grows, so do the interest payments on that debt. This can strain the federal budget, leaving less money for other priorities like education, infrastructure, and social programs.
Economic Impact: A high national debt can negatively impact economic growth. It can lead to higher interest rates, which can discourage investment and business growth. Additionally, it can erode investor confidence in the U.S. economy.
Future Generations: Future generations will face higher taxes and reduced public services due to the current national debt. This can limit their economic opportunities and quality of life.
Fiscal Sustainability: The long-term sustainability of the U.S. fiscal system is a major concern. Without significant reforms, the debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to continue rising, leading to potential economic instability.
Trump's Economic Promises
Trump's campaign pledges included job creation, tax cuts, and a focus on American manufacturing. These promises appealed to voters who felt left behind by globalisation and technological changes.
Resolving the U.S. national debt requires a multifaceted approach, considering various economic and social factors, and will likely involve difficult political decisions.
Fiscal Policy:
Expenditure reductions: Implement austerity measures by reducing government expenditures on non-essential programs, such as subsidies and welfare programs.
Tax Increases: Increasing taxes on individuals and corporations.
Spending Reforms: Implementing reforms to control future spending growth.
Inflation Targeting: The Federal Reserve can use monetary policy tools to control inflation and stimulate economic growth.
Debt Monetisation: This involves the Federal Reserve buying government bonds, but it can lead to inflation.
Economic Growth:
Productivity Growth: Encouraging innovation and technological advancements to boost economic productivity.
Trade Policy: Promoting free trade to increase exports and reduce trade deficits.
Investment in Human Capital: Investing in education and training to improve the work force's skills.
It's important to note that any solution to the national debt will require a combination of these strategies and careful consideration of their potential economic and social impacts. Additionally, political consensus and long-term planning will be crucial to addressing this significant challenge.
Trump's Tariff Policies
Trump's position on tariffs remained a cornerstone of his economic policy. He advocated for protective tariffs on imports, arguing that they would benefit American workers and industries.
Potential Economic Impacts
Economists debated the potential effects of Trump's tariff policies. While some argued that they could boost domestic manufacturing, others warned of increased consumer prices and potential trade wars.
Impact on the American Economy:
Increased Prices for Consumers: Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, leading to higher prices for consumers. This can reduce consumer purchasing power and lower overall consumer demand.
Reduced Economic Growth: Higher prices can lead to reduced consumer spending, which can slow economic growth.
Job Losses: While tariffs may protect some domestic industries, they can lead to job losses in other sectors, such as retail and manufacturing, that rely on imported goods or components.
Retaliatory Tariffs: Other countries may retaliate with their own tariffs on American exports, harming U.S. businesses and exporters.
Impact on the Supply Chain:
Disrupted Supply Chains: Tariffs can disrupt global supply chains, leading to delays, shortages, and increased costs for businesses.
Reduced Efficiency: Tariffs can force businesses to rely on less efficient domestic suppliers, increasing production costs.
Increased Uncertainty: Uncertainty about future tariffs can make it difficult for businesses to plan and invest.
Impact on Global Markets:
Trade Wars: Increased tariffs can escalate into trade wars, harming the global economy.
Reduced Global Trade: Tariffs can reduce global trade flows, limiting economic growth and innovation.
Geopolitical Tensions: Trade disputes can strain international relations and lead to geopolitical tensions.
While tariffs may protect some domestic industries, they often have negative consequences for consumers, businesses, and the overall economy. A balanced approach that promotes free trade and fair competition is generally considered beneficial for economic growth and prosperity.
Effects on Ordinary Americans
The impact of tariffs on ordinary Americans became a key campaign issue. Trump argued that short-term price increases would be offset by long-term economic benefits and job creation.
However, some economists argue that increased tariffs could lead to higher consumer prices, reduced economic growth, and job losses in the U.S in the following ways:
Higher Cost of Living: Increased prices on goods and services can erode purchasing power, making it harder for Americans to afford necessities.
Reduced Standard of Living: A decline in economic growth and job opportunities can lead to a lower standard of living for many Americans.
Abortion Stance and Electoral Impact
Trump maintained a pro-life stance throughout his campaign, appealing to conservative voters and religious groups who prioritise this issue.
The abortion debate remained highly divisive, with Trump's position energising his base while potentially alienating some moderate voters.
In several crucial swing states, the abortion issue played a significant role in mobilising conservative voters and influencing undecided voters.
Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 presidential election can be attributed to a combination of factors, including his stance on border control and illegal immigration, his economic promises, tariff policies, and position on social issues like abortion. While these factors resonated with a significant portion of the electorate, the election results also highlighted the deep divisions within American society on these critical issues.
As the nation moves forward under Trump's leadership, it remains to be seen how his policies will address the concerns that drove his victory and how they will impact the lives of ordinary Americans. The coming years will undoubtedly bring both challenges and opportunities as the country navigates these complex and often contentious issues.
FAQs
1. Q: How did Trump's immigration policies differ from his opponents?
A: Trump advocated for stricter border control measures and reduced illegal immigration, while his opponents generally favored more lenient policies.
2. Q: What were the main economic concerns that influenced voters in the 2024 election?
A: Key economic concerns included job security, national debt, and the impact of globalization on American industries.
3. Q: How might Trump's tariff policies affect international trade relations?
A: Trump's tariff policies could potentially lead to trade tensions with other countries and impact global supply chains.
4. Q: What role did social media play in Trump's 2024 campaign?
A: Social media remained a crucial tool for Trump to communicate directly with his supporters and shape public discourse.
5. Q: How might Trump's abortion stance impact future Supreme Court nominations?
A: Trump's pro-life position suggests he may nominate conservative justices who could potentially impact future rulings on abortion rights.
Comments